Consultants should be a lot more expensive

If you're not spending at least $1000 per hour on a consultant you just don't want it enough
Consultants should be a lot more expensive

There’s a common misconception in the industry that consultants are expensive. This is, of course, false.

Consultants are not expensive. Not nearly expensive enough.

You see, the goal of a consultant is to be a 10x engineer. Not in the sense of writing ten times more code, or moving ten times as many Jira tickets.

No, the real goal is to make your team feel ten times more productive simply by being around. To dramatically whoosh into a room, say something profound, yet slightly confusing, then disappear into the mist before anyone asks a follow-up question.

This kind of talent isn’t just valuable — it’s transcendent. Who else, 5 minutes into a site visit, is going to look you square in the eye and say, “All of this is stupid.”?


Consultants shouldn’t be hired to do work

Let’s be clear: consultants are not supposed to do work. That’s for employees. The whole point of hiring a consultant is that your team is too busy, too entrenched, or too misaligned to solve their own problems — or worse, they don’t even recognize their own problems.

Consultants are the Schrödinger’s cat of value delivery: they simultaneously do everything and nothing. And the second you try to observe it, the spell breaks.


Consulting should feel sacred

Every delivery from a consultant should be accompanied by a Gregorian chant and at least three ceremonial PowerPoint transitions. You shouldn’t receive a deliverable. You should witness it.

Your team should feel the need to avert their eyes.


Consultants should be trained like spies

Consultants should be trained in evasion, deception, and high-speed exits.

They should be able to:

  • Disappear from meetings whilst “taking things offline” leaving behind only action items
  • Maintain an aura of authority while saying absolutely nothing specific
  • Use phrases like “industry best practice”, “synergies” or “strategic alignment” as smokescreens to commitments

Of course, consultants should be paid like world-class athletes. — because they are elite performers. Their contracts should require biometric checks, retina scans, and at least one ceremonial sacrifice to the business gods before engagement.


You shouldn’t be able to summon a consultant

Access should be restricted. Consultants should be impossible to contact unless you know the correct public payphone to leave the sacrificial whiteboard marker.

You don’t just email a consultant. You summon them. You schedule a consultation via messenger pigeon or whisper it into a conch shell during the new moon.

Once a consultant is engaged, their time should be tracked in 30-second increments and invoiced in carbon credits. Any cancellation within a 48-hour window resulting in a mandatory LinkedIn endorsement.


Everything should feel bespoke

Consultants shouldn’t do slide decks. They should deliver artefacts — hand-stitched, artisanal strategies embedded in mahogany cases, with a proprietary font that costs $800 per vowel.

Your team should look at their work and think: “Wow. We can never afford this again.

Because that’s the point.

Consultants exist not to do what you can do, but to remind you of what you could be — in a vague, abstract way that cannot be implemented without another consultant.

Older post

2025-03-23

Hire More Off-Shore Teams

What distinguishes you from other developers?

I've built data pipelines across 3 continents at petabyte scales, for over 15 years. But the data doesn't matter if we don't solve the human problems first - an AI solution that nobody uses is worthless.

Are the robots going to kill us all?

Not any time soon. At least not in the way that you've got imagined thanks to the Terminator movies. Sure somebody with a DARPA grant is always going to strap a knife/gun/flamethrower on the side of a robot - but just like in Dr.Who - right now, that robot will struggle to even get out of the room, let alone up some stairs.

But AI is going to steal my job, right?

A year ago, the whole world was convinced that AI was going to steal their job. Now, the reality is that most people are thinking 'I wish this POC at work would go a bit faster to scan these PDFs'.

When am I going to get my self-driving car?

Humans are complicated. If we invented driving today - there's NO WAY IN HELL we'd let humans do it. They get distracted. They text their friends. They drink. They make mistakes. But the reality is, all of our streets, cities (and even legal systems) have been built around these limitations. It would be surprisingly easy to build self-driving cars if there were no humans on the road. But today no one wants to take liability. If a self-driving company kills someone, who's responsible? The manufacturer? The insurance company? The software developer?