Annual review 2024 - 1) Overview

Last year, having made an effort of migrating the blog (again), I’d read through a lot of my old blog posts - particular those end of year summaries. As a result, I made a concerted effort to sit down at the end of 2023 and make my way through a template that I drew up / lifted / pilfered.

Little did I know, that the whole thing would become a bit of a thing, and ended up taking me the best part of a month to cover every section that I wanted. And actually, I didn’t cover every topic I wanted - I just ended up pulling the trigger on publish at some point.

It turned out that once I sat down to write, each section ended up being a multi-part essay - and I ended up splitting it into 5 sections when it came to post it all on the website.

But I’m glad I did it. I’m glad that I have a time capsule into my thoughts and feelings that I was experiencing at the time. My hope now with this review is to just write. Get down a stream of conciousness as raw and unfiltered as possible. Then perhaps towards the end of January with a little period to mentally detach from one’s own writing, I’ll compare my 2023 review to 2024 and set about seeing what went well, what didn’t go so well and what was a complete failure. To that end, maybe I’ll learn something, and maybe I’ll be able to better goal-set into 2025.

  1. Intro
  2. Best of and memories
  3. Health - Running
  4. Health - Weights, weight & supplements
Older post

EOY fallout

How do you define successful engineering leadership?

The Philosophy

Many view technical leadership as being the “smartest architect in the room.” I see it as the opposite. My job is to build a room where I don’t have to be the smartest person because the systems, culture, and communication are so robust that the team can out-innovate me.

The Strategy

  • Alignment: Does every engineer understand how their sprint task impacts the company’s bottom line?
  • Velocity vs. Stability: We aren’t just “shipping fast”; we are building a predictable, repeatable engine that doesn’t collapse under its own weight at the next order of magnitude.
  • The Human Growth Curve: Success is when the engineering team’s capability evolves faster than the product’s complexity. If the team feels stagnant, the tech stack will soon follow.

What is your approach to scaling technical organizations?

The Philosophy

Scaling isn’t just “hiring more people” - that’s often how you slow down. Scaling is about moving from Individual Heroics to Organizational Systems.

The Strategy

  • The 3-Continent Perspective: Having managed global teams, I focus on “High-Signal Communication.” As you grow, the cost of a meeting triples. I implement “Asynchronous-First” cultures that protect deep-work time while ensuring no one is blocked by a timezone.

  • Modular Autonomy: I advocate for breaking down monolithic teams into autonomous units with clear ownership. This reduces the “communication tax” and allows us to scale the headcount without scaling the bureaucracy.

  • Automation as Infrastructure: At petabyte scale, manual intervention is a failure. I treat the developer experience (CI/CD, observability, self-service infra) as a first-class product to keep the “path to production” frictionless.

How do you balance high-growth velocity with technical stability?

The Philosophy

Technical debt isn’t a “bad thing” to be avoided; it’s a set of historical decisions that no longer serve you. Like any loan, leverage can accelerate growth when investments payoff. But if velocity and returns are slowing you need a payment plan before the interest kills you.

The Strategy

  • The ROI Filter: I don’t refactor for the sake of “clean code.” I don’t refactor a micro-service with no users. I refactor when the pain on that debt - measured in bugs, downtime, or developer frustration - starts to exceed the cost of the fix.

  • Zero-Downtime Culture: Especially at scale, stability is a feature. I implement “Guardrail Engineering” where the system is designed to fail gracefully, ensuring that a Series B growth spike becomes a success story rather than a post-mortem.

  • The 70/20/10 Rule: I typically aim to dedicate 70% of resources to new features, 20% to infrastructure/debt, and 10% to R&D. This ensures we never stop innovating, but we never stop fortifying either.