2023-09-18

Well I’m not crazy. And I’m not a dog person either.

My previous exposure to meetings that suddenly took a Francophone bent were previously of the sort where I was the sole Anglophone in the area. Today was my first lower management meeting were an Eastern European (of four languages but French is not their primary) returned from parental and the other a Québécois who had been on vacation. And both of them were privately messaging me on the side with a “WTF is this?”

What can I do other than say this is the new normal. Hilariously, the Eastern European is married to a local, lifelong Quebecer and despite not living in French thought that their French was pretty good. But quickly came to the same conclusion as I. Being able to watch some TV and banter through some polite small talk is not the same thing as a full blown meeting.

It’s interesting.

I don’t know how this is sustainable. And I suspect it’s not meant to be.

I cannot fulfill a big part of my job. And that makes me exceedingly uncomfortable. It makes me reconsider my job. It makes reconsider living in this city, in this province.

Should I just join a start up that is exempt by their small size. Or should I just join a billion dollar company that is also exempt, but because their linga Franca is English. Should I not just get something remote in the US or semi remote in Toronto.

Maybe I should just simply reframe my thinking. Maybe I am not in actuality a Canadian citizen. Maybe I should view this as I am an immigrant again, to Quebec. If I moved to France, I might not enjoy the linguistic journey. But I wouldn’t kid myself. I would be a stranger in a foreign land and learning the tongue would be part of that journey.

I cannot change the politics of this province single handedly. And when I don’t agree with the laws what choice do I have. I can either comply and shut up. Or I can vote with my feet and leave.

Older post

2023-09-17

Newer post

2023-09-20

How do you define successful engineering leadership?

The Philosophy

Many view technical leadership as being the “smartest architect in the room.” I see it as the opposite. My job is to build a room where I don’t have to be the smartest person because the systems, culture, and communication are so robust that the team can out-innovate me.

The Strategy

  • Alignment: Does every engineer understand how their sprint task impacts the company’s bottom line?
  • Velocity vs. Stability: We aren’t just “shipping fast”; we are building a predictable, repeatable engine that doesn’t collapse under its own weight at the next order of magnitude.
  • The Human Growth Curve: Success is when the engineering team’s capability evolves faster than the product’s complexity. If the team feels stagnant, the tech stack will soon follow.

What is your approach to scaling technical organizations?

The Philosophy

Scaling isn’t just “hiring more people” - that’s often how you slow down. Scaling is about moving from Individual Heroics to Organizational Systems.

The Strategy

  • The 3-Continent Perspective: Having managed global teams, I focus on “High-Signal Communication.” As you grow, the cost of a meeting triples. I implement “Asynchronous-First” cultures that protect deep-work time while ensuring no one is blocked by a timezone.

  • Modular Autonomy: I advocate for breaking down monolithic teams into autonomous units with clear ownership. This reduces the “communication tax” and allows us to scale the headcount without scaling the bureaucracy.

  • Automation as Infrastructure: At petabyte scale, manual intervention is a failure. I treat the developer experience (CI/CD, observability, self-service infra) as a first-class product to keep the “path to production” frictionless.

How do you balance high-growth velocity with technical stability?

The Philosophy

Technical debt isn’t a “bad thing” to be avoided; it’s a set of historical decisions that no longer serve you. Like any loan, leverage can accelerate growth when investments payoff. But if velocity and returns are slowing you need a payment plan before the interest kills you.

The Strategy

  • The ROI Filter: I don’t refactor for the sake of “clean code.” I don’t refactor a micro-service with no users. I refactor when the pain on that debt - measured in bugs, downtime, or developer frustration - starts to exceed the cost of the fix.

  • Zero-Downtime Culture: Especially at scale, stability is a feature. I implement “Guardrail Engineering” where the system is designed to fail gracefully, ensuring that a Series B growth spike becomes a success story rather than a post-mortem.

  • The 70/20/10 Rule: I typically aim to dedicate 70% of resources to new features, 20% to infrastructure/debt, and 10% to R&D. This ensures we never stop innovating, but we never stop fortifying either.