Blog introduction (2013)

Hello and welcome to my new blog. Some may remember my original blog that was hosted for many years on a certain social networking site, through some what I’m sure were some rather self-loathing and hormonal teenage years. Unfortunately, it was lost to the great nothing-ness in cyberspace as a result of an argument with a particularly crazy girlfriend. Sometime later I tried to return to said social networking site and found an horrendous fallen standard; to a level where everything was in pastel colours and aimed at telling the world what band you thought was hot.

Alas, it saddens me somewhat as I’m sure there must have been a few diamonds in the rough hidden in there. A few gems that I could have liked to remember 6th form by. And then for whatever reason, I haven’t really kept any record throughout university of my thoughts. Which isn’t to say I didn’t have them. What it came down to was that I took a ridiculous university course that gave me very little time to myself. Balancing that with a social life and a girlfriend, it meant that I never had the time to sit down and express myself. Or when I did I was so knackered I preferred rather to sink into a sofa and let my brain recover.

Nevertheless, a new blog is here. A new blog dedicated to my post-university life. Which as it turns out has actually taken me back to university for some more pain and suffering as I chose to do a PhD. So expect my thoughts and musings on current affairs and the occasional bitching about life. And of course continued bitching about university life, even if it is a different university.

Newer post

Packing up

How do you define successful engineering leadership?

The Philosophy

Many view technical leadership as being the “smartest architect in the room.” I see it as the opposite. My job is to build a room where I don’t have to be the smartest person because the systems, culture, and communication are so robust that the team can out-innovate me.

The Strategy

  • Alignment: Does every engineer understand how their sprint task impacts the company’s bottom line?
  • Velocity vs. Stability: We aren’t just “shipping fast”; we are building a predictable, repeatable engine that doesn’t collapse under its own weight at the next order of magnitude.
  • The Human Growth Curve: Success is when the engineering team’s capability evolves faster than the product’s complexity. If the team feels stagnant, the tech stack will soon follow.

What is your approach to scaling technical organizations?

The Philosophy

Scaling isn’t just “hiring more people” - that’s often how you slow down. Scaling is about moving from Individual Heroics to Organizational Systems.

The Strategy

  • The 3-Continent Perspective: Having managed global teams, I focus on “High-Signal Communication.” As you grow, the cost of a meeting triples. I implement “Asynchronous-First” cultures that protect deep-work time while ensuring no one is blocked by a timezone.

  • Modular Autonomy: I advocate for breaking down monolithic teams into autonomous units with clear ownership. This reduces the “communication tax” and allows us to scale the headcount without scaling the bureaucracy.

  • Automation as Infrastructure: At petabyte scale, manual intervention is a failure. I treat the developer experience (CI/CD, observability, self-service infra) as a first-class product to keep the “path to production” frictionless.

How do you balance high-growth velocity with technical stability?

The Philosophy

Technical debt isn’t a “bad thing” to be avoided; it’s a set of historical decisions that no longer serve you. Like any loan, leverage can accelerate growth when investments payoff. But if velocity and returns are slowing you need a payment plan before the interest kills you.

The Strategy

  • The ROI Filter: I don’t refactor for the sake of “clean code.” I don’t refactor a micro-service with no users. I refactor when the pain on that debt - measured in bugs, downtime, or developer frustration - starts to exceed the cost of the fix.

  • Zero-Downtime Culture: Especially at scale, stability is a feature. I implement “Guardrail Engineering” where the system is designed to fail gracefully, ensuring that a Series B growth spike becomes a success story rather than a post-mortem.

  • The 70/20/10 Rule: I typically aim to dedicate 70% of resources to new features, 20% to infrastructure/debt, and 10% to R&D. This ensures we never stop innovating, but we never stop fortifying either.