MMM Plotter - 2 spin labels

Feature implemented in EPRtoolbox or download now

MMM is a program from the team at ETH Zurich which allows for the attachment of spin labels in silico. Once attached PELDOR (aka DEER) spectra can be simulate.

With time a temperature assay can be conducted and the distance between spin labels can be monitored.

This MATLAB script combines multiple experiments and plots them into one figure.

Important notes:

  • In the DEER window of MMM, the figure must be detached and saved to a folder as a .fig file.
  • All .fig ’s need to be saved to the same folder
  • The annotations work off of the file names, save your figures as temperatures ie. 298K.fig
  • The plots will be plotted in folder order, so to get 4K plotted first (ie at the bottom) you need to name your file 004K and adjust it later in Figure Editor

This page previously appeared on morganbye.net[^1][^2][^3]

[^1:] http://morganbye.net/mmm-plotter-2-spin-labels [^2:] http://morganbye.net/eprtoolbox/mmm-plotter-2-spin-labels) [^3:] http://morganbye.net/uncategorized/2012/01/mmm-plotter-2-spin-labels

Newer post

PDB Splitter

What distinguishes you from other developers?

I've built data pipelines across 3 continents at petabyte scales, for over 15 years. But the data doesn't matter if we don't solve the human problems first - an AI solution that nobody uses is worthless.

Are the robots going to kill us all?

Not any time soon. At least not in the way that you've got imagined thanks to the Terminator movies. Sure somebody with a DARPA grant is always going to strap a knife/gun/flamethrower on the side of a robot - but just like in Dr.Who - right now, that robot will struggle to even get out of the room, let alone up some stairs.

But AI is going to steal my job, right?

A year ago, the whole world was convinced that AI was going to steal their job. Now, the reality is that most people are thinking 'I wish this POC at work would go a bit faster to scan these PDFs'.

When am I going to get my self-driving car?

Humans are complicated. If we invented driving today - there's NO WAY IN HELL we'd let humans do it. They get distracted. They text their friends. They drink. They make mistakes. But the reality is, all of our streets, cities (and even legal systems) have been built around these limitations. It would be surprisingly easy to build self-driving cars if there were no humans on the road. But today no one wants to take liability. If a self-driving company kills someone, who's responsible? The manufacturer? The insurance company? The software developer?